Seat Belts Argumentative Essay

A lieu do is a restraining device installed in a fomite to prevent or minimize the force of an injury during a crash ( gift Belts 5). Although it is likewise known as a galosh fringe, the safety part is the key issue that is causing much broil around drivers, manufacturers, and seekers alike. The main persuasion around the debate is the fact that although research indicates that when fag belts are utilizationd properly they save lives, opponents argue that mandating their use drop actually character to a greater extent harm than good in approximately cases and is an infringement on personal rights.Car accidents are the leading cause of death for people under 35. Due to the fact that at least(prenominal) 40,000 people die each year in car accidents, the righteousness that mandates crapperbelts on all drivers/passengers in vehicles should stay in place. Although target Belts aim been shown to provide safety to drivers and passengers who use them, not e rattlingone i s a fan of the obligatory seat belt uprightnesss. Opponents who are against the idea of mandatory seat belt laws say that they might be safer without seat belts and that airbags will shelter them.Many people argue that they may be safer without seat belts. According to the article empower Belts In high-speed collisions where crash forces are extreme, seat belts redeem been tie in to life-threatening conditions, including cardiac arrests and injuries to the chest, abdomen, or neck (5). They put forward this idea because they feel that seat belts are causing more harm than good. However, airbags were never made to take the place of a seatbelt, and when worn with a seatbelt, they emergence the effectiveness of it by 40%.Airbags also dont protect from side-impacts at all so they arent safer than seatbelts. Another argument opponents against seatbelts bind is that mandatory seatbelt laws are a violation of freedom. They claim that they should have a choice whether or not they sho uld wear a seatbelt when in a vehicle. However, this is not an infringement on freedom. Freedom stops when we get to a point where others may be harmed or killed. As soon as something puts lives in danger, the right of freedom disappears thus making mandatory seatbelt laws a non-infringement on freedom.Seat belts are the single most effective commerce safety device for preventing death and injury in a vehicle (Seat Belt arctic, Seat Belt Laws). Wearing a seat belt female genital organ reduce the risk of crash injuries by 50%. Seat belts save lives and are effective in preventing ejections from a vehicle. plot of land opponents argue that in certain cases it is better to not wear a seatbelt, wearing a seatbelt is usually the safer route. A person will never know what type of accident they might enter and thus cant prepare for a certain type of accident.You cant know whether or not having a seatbelt will save you. Its better to wear a seatbelt and have a 50% of choice than not we aring a seatbelt and have a 3% rule of being in a situational accident where not having a seat belt will save you. Research shows that Seat Belts saved more than 75,000 lives from 2004 to 2008 (Seat Belt Safety, Seat Belt Laws). Without the mandatory use of seat belts, galore(postnominal) lives could be put in danger and this would have blackball social and economic effects on society.49 States in the USA have issued mandatory seat belt laws to promote safe habits and to protect the people. With this law in place, many lives have been saved as people were forced to wear seat belts to properly protect them in crashes. In a crash, there are two types of collisions. These are called, Primary and Secondary collisions. A Primary Collision is the impact between the vehicle and another vehicle or object. A Secondary Collision refers to the impact of an occupant with some part of the vehicles interior, such as the steering wheel, the roof, or the windshield (Seat Belts 2).Seat Belts are designed to tighten at the assume moment, so that they either prevent the second collision or at least minimize the injury potential of the even. Without the mandatory seat belt laws, many people will die in crashes in which dim-witted use of a seat belt could have saved them. Seat Belts are optimal to Vehicle Safety and should be required to be used in every vehicle. Even if you are a very good driver or have never been in an accident, you can never predict what will happen when youre on the road. Seat Belts can help save the lives of both you and others around you.With Seat Belts Laws in place, vehicle travel will be a much safer place. Safety is a concern not just with seat belts, but also with many things in life. When driving, safety should be above all and many safety technologies such as airbags, anti-lock brakes, and traction control are in place to protect the people. Seat Belts are the main force that is parsimoniousness many lives of drivers young and old. Although se at belts provide a good take aim of safety, the debate over the relative safety of such devices, as wholesome as the rights to passengers to choose whether or not they want to use these devices, is sure to continue.